Articles >> horse-racing >>

A Good First Run In A Bumper


 

A Good First Run In A Bumper

 

It is at this time of year my research begins to switch from flat racing to National Hunt. By the time you read this article, we will be starting to see the flat season slowing up a little and the National Hunt season gathering a bit of pace. For many the National Hunt season really gets going in October, but it is always good to be well prepared!

 

In this article I am looking at horses that finished in the first three on their debut in a bumper (National Hunt flat race). The data is taken from the last full five years 2007 to 2011. From this initial starting point I will be looking at their subsequent performances, up to a maximum of 12 runs (career runs 2 to 13).

 

So to begin with let us look at what happens on subsequent career starts for these runners:

 

Career run

Wins

Runs

SR%

Profit/loss

ROI%

2nd

113

771

14.7

-£216.93

-28.1

3rd

116

724

16.0

-£35.46

-4.9

4th

104

632

16.5

-£176.61

-27.9

5th

71

525

13.5

-£194.87

-37.1

6th

83

464

17.9

-£67.59

-14.6

7th

63

382

16.5

-£72.49

-19.0

8th

62

325

19.1

+£114.06

+35.1

9th

55

263

20.9

+£43.16

+16.4

10th

43

226

19.0

+£24.04

+10.6

11th

23

191

12.0

-£59.05

-30.9

12th

29

163

17.8

+£50.57

+31.0

13th

28

148

18.9

+£23.17

+15.7

 

Combining all runs their record reads 790 wins from 4814 runs (SR 16.4%) for a loss of £568.02 (ROI -11.8%). Clearly there are several runners in the study that have yet to run a further 12 times, but we still have a decent data set for runners who have reached at least 13 career starts. The figures are extremely interesting and perhaps can be seen more clearly when I group the data thus:

 

Career run

Wins

Runs

SR%

Profit/loss

ROI%

2nd to 7th

550

3498

15.7

-£763.96

-21.8

8th to 13th

240

1316

18.2

+£195.94

+14.9

 

Career runs 8 to 13 have comfortably outperformed runs 2 to 7 – not just in terms of strike rate, but in terms of returns as well. Why is this? Well, a possible theory is that horses that perform well on their bumper debut are subsequently pitched in at a better level too early and it takes the trainer a few runs to find its actual level. Another theory is that punters latch onto good performances and hence are prepared to stick with such runners for a few runs at least. Hence the prices of these horses contract due to the punter support and offer poor value and produce bigger losses as a result. Whatever the reason, the data is worth further exploration and I intend to look at pre 2007 data when I get the time.

 

Moving on, let me look at overall trainer performance next and from there see if there are any trainer angles worth pursuing (I have only used trainers who have had 60+ runs) :

 

Trainer

Wins

Runs

SR%

Profit/loss

ROI%

Nicky Henderson

76

248

30.6

+£43.22

+17.4

Donald McCain

73

300

24.3

+£36.59

+12.2

Paul Nicholls

24

104

23.1

+£20.45

+19.7

Nigel Twiston-Davies

21

92

22.8

+£66.51

+72.3

Jonjo O'Neill

14

68

20.6

-£13.48

-19.8

Nicky Richards

15

75

20.0

-£18.96

-25.3

Malcolm Jefferson

13

65

20.0

+£26.29

+40.4

Alan Swinbank

25

126

19.8

-£45.15

-35.8

Alan King

34

192

17.7

-£64.42

-33.6

Tim Vaughan         

14

80

17.5

-£43.90

-54.9

Philip Hobbs

20

120

16.7

-£39.22

-32.7

Charlie Longsdon

11

66

16.7

-£29.79

-45.1

David Pipe

16

109

14.7

-£57.42

-52.7

Oliver Sherwood

17

118

14.4

-£15.31

-13.0

Paul Webber

11

78

14.1

-£8.17

-10.5

Warren Greatrex

8

68

11.8

-£46.33

-68.1

Venetia Williams

8

74

10.8

-£40.38

-54.6

Keith Reveley

8

81

9.9

-£52.51

-64.8

Brendan Powell

4

69

5.8

-£45.50

-65.9

 

Four familiar names at the top of the list – Nicky Henderson, Donald McCain, Paul Nicholls and Nigel Twiston-Davies – and all four showing a profit with their runners. It makes sense therefore to look at their runners in a bit more detail.

 

Nicky Henderson – it is interesting to note that Henderson’s record is in complete contrast with the overall figures. His best stats come from career runs 2, 3 and 4:

 

Career run

Wins

Runs

SR%

Profit/loss

ROI%

2nd

13

45

28.9

+£12.84

+28.5

3rd

17

49

34.7

+£11.12

+22.7

4th

18

41

43.9

+£28.85

+70.4

 

Overall his stats for these next three runs combine to give 48 wins from 135 runs (SR 35.6%) for a profit of £52.81 (ROI +39.1%). Indeed, he is no averse to taking his runners to the top tracks on these next three starts – his record when going to Grade 1 tracks on career start 2, 3 or 4 reads a tidy 17 wins from 51 (SR 33.3%) for a profit of £34.84 (ROI +68.3%).

It also should be noted that 36 of the 49 Henderson runners have gone on to win at least one race after their initial good debut run. This equates to over 73%.

 

Donald McCain – only 3 winners in total behind Henderson, although he has had more runs overall. He has a similar record to Henderson in terms of the fact that 72% of his runners have gone on to win after their good debut run – 31 from 43 runners to be precise. Having said that a few of his runners were not originally in his care for the debut run – he seems a trainer that is popular in terms of switching to early in their career. Another point worth noting (for in running punters) is that his front runners have a far superior record to those runners that are held up – 34% of his front runners go on to win their race, while just 11% of his hold up horses eventually prevail.

 

Paul Nicholls – a good overall record but I would be wary of backing his runners on their second career start as only 2 of 17 have won for a loss of £13.27 (ROI -78.1%). Admittedly this is a small sample but a trainer of Nicholls’ stature rarely has figures this poor even from a limited data set. Nicholls also has a poor record when sending runners to Grade 1 tracks – just 4 wins from 36 (SR 11.1%) for a loss of £16.13 (ROI -44.8%). Hence it looks best to concentrate on runners that do NOT race at a Grade 1 track as their record reads a far more pleasing 20 wins from 68 (SR 29.4%) for a profit of £36.58 (ROI +53.8%).

 

Nigel Twiston-Davies – the figures look excellent on the face of it, but a 50/1 has skewed things rather. However, he would have still made an overall profit without that winner. It seems to be a positive when Sam Twiston-Davies is on board for his father – 13 wins from 45 (SR 27.9%) for a profit of £28.42 (ROI +63.2%). Twiston-Davies is another trainer where in running punters can gain an edge - 14 from his 37 front runners have gone onto win (37.8%) while of his 18 horses that were held up, none have gone onto win.

 

Let me now look at the courses where the horses made their debut to see if there are any tracks worth noting. I have combined the results of all subsequent starts from the debut course. Firstly a look at the initial courses that have produced the best strike rates:

 

 

Course on debut

Wins

Runs

SR%

Profit/loss

ROI%

Warwick

49

184

26.6

+£72.73

+39.5

Haydock

14

53

26.4

+£7.80

+14.7

Sandown

13

50

26.0

-£1.21

-2.4

Exeter

29

112

25.9

+£79.74

+71.2

Kelso

31

131

23.7

+£11.05

+8.4

Hexham

22

101

21.8

+£76.91

+76.1

Ascot

5

23

21.7

-£8.53

-37.1

Newcastle

35

171

20.5

+£57.57

+33.7

Kempton

32

157

20.4

+£2.30

+1.5

 

A mix of tracks in the list, but it is interesting to note that four of the eight Grade 1 tracks appear on the list, although it should be stressed that Ascot’s data is limited. Let me look at courses that have fared less well:

 

Course on debut

Wins

Runs

SR%

Profit/loss

ROI%

Carlisle

11

93

11.8

-£39.83

-42.8

Plumpton

17

148

11.5

-£45.80

-30.9

Cheltenham

7

62

11.3

-£31.94

-51.5

Ayr

7

68

10.3

-£38.74

-57.0

Towcester

22

218

10.1

-£108.15

-49.6

Hereford

19

202

9.4

-£82.58

-40.9

Sedgefield

9

103

8.7

-£62.83

-61.0

Lingfield

0

12

0.0

-£12.00

-100.0

 

Somewhat surprising to see Cheltenham with a low striker rate, whereas it is less of a surprise to see some of the lowest grade tracks such as Hereford, Plumpton, Sedgefield and Towcester in the list. So despite the Cheltenham figures, and looking at both tables as a whole, it seems that the quality of track in terms of debut does make a difference, with generally the better courses producing better subsequent performances.

 

All in all the research has been interesting and some patterns certainly seemed to have emerged.

 








Free Registration
 
Systems
Free Horse Racing System
 
 
Racing Research
Racing Report Vault
 
Flat Racing Trainer Report
 
Horse Racing Research Articles
 
Bookmakers & Odds
Bookmakers and Free Bets
 
Odds Comparison
 
Top Link Partners


 

Copyright PunterProfits.com